|
|
| Author |
Message |
dayvo none

Joined: 04 Mar 2010 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Mar 04, 2010 8:58am Post subject: ircd of choice for new server |
|
|
Im setting up an ircd for a new website myself and a few mates have been working on. The main need is so we all have somewhere to meet and discuss what work needs to be done etc.. however there is a potential for website users to also use this ircd.
Ive setup a few ircd's and services before, but i would probably put myself in the beginner stage, as all i did really was compile and configure 'to get it going'.. i didnt really tweek anything to get the best performance.
Anyhows.. i was wondering if people could make a few suggestions of a good reliable ircd, with good services support?
CentOS 5.4 | Dedicated.
Many thanks.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SkydiverGoose Lurker

Joined: 25 Dec 2009 Posts: 119 Location: 10 minutes away. Wanna hang out?
|
Posted: Mar 04, 2010 12:40pm Post subject: |
|
|
I will scream shout and holler all day long:
* Inspircd (1.2 or 2.0, even though 2.0 is beta, it's stable)
* Atheme IRC Services
Inspircd offers so many modules it's ridiculous, it's loaded with features, incredibly stable and efficient, and very easy to use. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Trixar_za Eleet

Joined: 10 Dec 2006 Posts: 624 Location: South Africa
|
Posted: Mar 04, 2010 2:44pm Post subject: |
|
|
It would be wrong not to mention Nefarious IRCd (IRCu based) with X3 or Charybdis IRCd (or any other Bahamut based IRCds) with Atheme.
It depends on what your needs will be, what you will wish to run with your IRCd and how flexible you want it to be. Don't just settle for the default UnrealIRCd with Anope just because the majority of other networks uses it.
The only time you should consider using UnrealIRCd is if you want to spend a lot of time linking with alot of smaller and newer networks or your using software that works JUST with UnrealIRCd (rare these days, but does happen). Even then you can still pick to use Atheme, Anope or even IRC Services as your new services package.
So play around with them and decide on the one that works best for you.
EDIT: These wikipedia comparison links might help you decide:
Comparing IRCds
Comparing Services Packages |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bertrum Eleet

Joined: 30 Mar 2008 Posts: 573 Location: Venus
|
Posted: Mar 04, 2010 7:17pm Post subject: |
|
|
| My preference in ircd would be Inspircd, the fact it is modular wins in my opinion. Services, well i've only ever used anope myself, but have never had problems to be honest.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SkydiverGoose Lurker

Joined: 25 Dec 2009 Posts: 119 Location: 10 minutes away. Wanna hang out?
|
Posted: Mar 05, 2010 2:30am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ah, but Anope doesn't support SASL! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bertrum Eleet

Joined: 30 Mar 2008 Posts: 573 Location: Venus
|
Posted: Mar 05, 2010 5:41am Post subject: |
|
|
don't shout at me goose or ill direct a ban at u i my next forum post in the ban game  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lyhne1 Lurker

Joined: 05 Jul 2008 Posts: 232 Location: In your Mom
|
Posted: Mar 05, 2010 2:07pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Bertrum :Ban for make open threats and not asking me to join in on the fun... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Trixar_za Eleet

Joined: 10 Dec 2006 Posts: 624 Location: South Africa
|
Posted: Mar 05, 2010 3:24pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Bertrum wrote: | | My preference in ircd would be Inspircd, the fact it is modular wins in my opinion. Services, well i've only ever used anope myself, but have never had problems to be honest.. |
Being modular to the point of breaking it when compatible modules aren't loaded for linking servers isnt' a plus - not to mention you can unload server critical models before starting the IRCd.
Even Icarus IRCd (Unreal based) has a similar modular design, so I don't see why being modular to the point of breaking it is a plus though  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SkydiverGoose Lurker

Joined: 25 Dec 2009 Posts: 119 Location: 10 minutes away. Wanna hang out?
|
Posted: Mar 06, 2010 11:19am Post subject: |
|
|
| To the point of breaking it? Please reword |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Trixar_za Eleet

Joined: 10 Dec 2006 Posts: 624 Location: South Africa
|
Posted: Mar 07, 2010 1:46am Post subject: |
|
|
| SkydiverGoose wrote: | | To the point of breaking it? Please reword |
It's just that one thing that always bothered me about InspIRCd. The fact that you can unload modules critical to the operation of the IRCd. They've pretty much sacrificed everything else that is good about the IRCd JUST so it could be completely modular - to the very point of breaking the IRCd if certain modules are unloaded. This is NOT a plus in an IRCd, nor is it desirable. They should have left the critical set of modules protected and loaded by default with no option to remove them at all. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PingBad Post Whore

Joined: 05 Feb 2005 Posts: 3027 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Mar 07, 2010 2:14am Post subject: |
|
|
| Trixar_za wrote: | | SkydiverGoose wrote: | | To the point of breaking it? Please reword |
It's just that one thing that always bothered me about InspIRCd. The fact that you can unload modules critical to the operation of the IRCd. They've pretty much sacrificed everything else that is good about the IRCd JUST so it could be completely modular - to the very point of breaking the IRCd if certain modules are unloaded. This is NOT a plus in an IRCd, nor is it desirable. They should have left the critical set of modules protected and loaded by default with no option to remove them at all. | By that logic, then, said critical modules should not have been modules at all and instead hardcoded into the core |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Trixar_za Eleet

Joined: 10 Dec 2006 Posts: 624 Location: South Africa
|
Posted: Mar 07, 2010 2:22am Post subject: |
|
|
| PingBad wrote: | | By that logic, then, said critical modules should not have been modules at all and instead hardcoded into the core |
Exactly! Hell, I know some people (including you) that would be on that like a fat kid on a cupcake - and in both cases it's not pretty. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PingBad Post Whore

Joined: 05 Feb 2005 Posts: 3027 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Mar 07, 2010 2:24am Post subject: |
|
|
| lol, you mean I'd break it without trying (such as that spectacular episode with Analogue)? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Trixar_za Eleet

Joined: 10 Dec 2006 Posts: 624 Location: South Africa
|
Posted: Mar 07, 2010 7:24am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, that's exactly what I meant. I did it myself and accidentally. Say you get a noob that wants to start without ANY modules loaded - well you can't do that with InspIRCd because it WILL break or atleast act very strangely...
Don't get me wrong - I'm not saying InspIRCd is crap - in fact it's the opposite and pretty powerful if you put in the time to configure it up properly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Meebie none

Joined: 10 Jan 2010 Posts: 19 Location: UK
|
Posted: Mar 07, 2010 10:27am Post subject: |
|
|
IRCu+IRCm
IRCm (IRC MeeX) is a P10 Internet Relay Chat Server Daemon (IRCD) based on Undernets IRCu2.10.12 branch of Universal IRCD
The IRCm Project was forged as a chance to update many old IRCu2 patches to the U2.10.12 standard plus integrate a few other non-stock IRCu features from other IRCD's / IRCu2 variants such as Asuka, Lain, Boxen & Nefarious |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|