|
|
| Author |
Message |
Calum
Guest
|
 Posted: Sep 18, 2005 2:50pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| JusticeMan wrote: |
Still afraid to disclose your real IRC nick? The staff member who did this never really showed coz he was working from "behind" with you ppl, but remember, truth will prevail, and everything will come out by time. |
I had to comment:
Sure, I used to be known as Sycko, rt, and all the other shit, I've decided to put "Calum" as my nickname on Quakenet so feel free to PM me and shout abuse. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Henrik
Guest
|
| Posted: Sep 18, 2005 2:54pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I told you already, I still don't see a need for reading all this crap, I just need to add: the staff member who did this just showed up, furthermore he did it "in the open", not from behind. What most users seem to lack from time to time is a working pair of eyes, heh |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Matt_
none
Joined: 16 Sep 2005
Posts: 29
|
| Posted: Sep 18, 2005 10:55pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quakenet ircops have always been assholes. I run an irc network and i make sure my ircops are always nice and helpful. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Calum
Guest
|
| Posted: Sep 19, 2005 12:26am Post subject: |
|
|
| Matt_ wrote: | | Quakenet ircops have always been assholes. I run an irc network and i make sure my ircops are always nice and helpful. |
I bet you've never ran a network with more than 100 users then, then you would reliase why people do what they have to do. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
w00t
Eleet
Joined: 09 Jun 2004
Posts: 698
Location: Nowra, Australia
|
| Posted: Sep 19, 2005 12:35am Post subject: |
|
|
Incorrect assumption. I've seen a number of networks with more than 100 people, and not all of them suck.
Admittedly, quite a few do (dalnet, undernet both spring to mind..) but then there's places like freenode that at least tend to keep their politics somewhat internal rather than involving users. And I'll admit also that freenode do a fair job at everything else.
Quakenet, I've never really gotten involved in, so I'll stick clear of that. I will however question the intentions of this thread, as it really seems to be going nowhere.
Apart from those two points, nothing to add. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JusticeMan
none
Joined: 16 Sep 2005
Posts: 6
|
| Posted: Sep 19, 2005 5:28am Post subject: |
|
|
[Calum wrote:]I'm not being the childish one at the moment. I recommend this topic gets closed, what I previously said first, says it all.
I meant to say the gline had been lifted before 2months were up, don't know why, don't care either way.
I am controlling ALLNITECAFE now, and preventing all sorts of spam, and so on. If you don't like it, then it's your own fault for getting suspended or whatever.
Lanmate and a few others are controlling CHATZONE for the sake of the channel(needs some sort of management)
And when the channel was re-opened, an _idle_ bot was holding the channel, this meaning no one running the channel, so it was fair.
and no, I'm no way involved with Quakenet, I've just been in that channel for along time and know what goes on.
-EOD- [/quote]
1 You are not being childish, you are the same lier that we've known at Quakenet.
2 So poor lamer, you're really confused about the gline timings and etc, well lets go to #Help without you're fucked up staff member and sort it out (if both of you the guts, since you both should know that you're lying)
3 Staffs arent supposed to control channels or give a damn abt it's needs or management. No owner means no channel according to Quakenet rules. So you're tellin me when owners leave a channel staffs take it over right? Lamer.
4 You have been in that channel less than a month, and if you're not even sure of that, lets ask some IRCops to investigate it (im currently glines by that lame oper of urs, i'll find some other ip to get in). The opers know everything, so no worries Lamer.
5 The best way for you to justify your ass is by lying, but who cares, we cant change what has happened, so i dont give a damn to what you say, neither do i need your replies or excuses.
6 According to Quakenet rules, whoever is op in a channel, be it idlebot or whatever shit it is, it is the righful admin of the channel and no one, not even the IRCops are supposed to deop it. And staffs arent supposed to be bothered about if anyone is running a channel or not, Lamer its out of the rules, there are hundreds of thousands of channels in quakenet and unless you're really interested abt big public channels like #AllNiteCafe and #Chatzone, you wudnt bother abt it.
Now listen dumbass F_Jack, your lies arent gettin you anywhere. I dont need any further reply from you so buzz off. The topic is abt lame opers, not random noobs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JusticeMan
none
Joined: 16 Sep 2005
Posts: 6
|
| Posted: Sep 19, 2005 6:16am Post subject: |
|
|
To Henrik the retard:
1 I hope you are not just another nick from Calum's ip. Lamer.
2 If you're really an oper, well CONGRTAS. You just said it, you admitted to the fact that you gave the channel to someone else just because you thought we are "bad ops".
3 You werent supposed to "know much" abt #AllNiteCafe or even be concerned abt it at all, because it belongs to someone else. IT HAS OWNERS AND THATS ENOUGH FOR A CHANNEL.
4 I'm sure what stimulated your greed for power was the fact that these channels are the biggest mIRC public channels and you completely agreed that you had to abuse your oper priviledges for the "channel's sake".
Henrik wrote:
| Quote: | Thus #allnitecafe just as #chatzone should be given to users who have a clue, know things related to IRC and just want to keep an eye on a channel, not because they are power hungry abusers but instead because they care for some reason.
|
5 Dude, this is extremely lame! There are hundreds of thousands of channels in quakenet, and IRCops arent supposed to manage channels. Channels exist because they have owners, and when a channel has no admin, it just does not exist. Private channels are not created for you greedy staffs to takeover, they are created ehn someone joins and gets op in the channel, you illiterate retard. We created #AllNiteCafe and #Chatzone and we have had those for years, and why would the "channel's wellbeing" suddenly interest you while there are so many channel names out there to create one for yourself you greedy swain.
And by the way, so now its about "knowing things about irc" eh? We've created the channels and had them for six years, and now you're telling us that we need to know about irc to take care of our own channel? Cmon man, lets go to #feds and discuss abt it, looks like you've made some brand new Quakenet rule "users should know how to control their channels, else it will be taken over by IRCops"
You know my foot abt IRC retard, even your dad wudnt know as much given the whole lifetime. I've been in IRC for 6 years and i've been scripting since then, not only that, I'm a first year computer science student at MIT and know more abt computer programs and programming languages than you could know gaining a PhD.
Henrik wrote:
| Quote: | | I gave #allnitecafe to a user I deem suitable for that job and I will stick to that decision, simply because "it works". The user who send his dumb idle bot in to "take" that channel, in my humble opinion, was no good choice and that's why I replaced him. |
6 So you gave #allnitecafe to a user after all. This is what the Opers were tellin us not to worry abt, that IRCops arent supposed to "give one's channel to someone else" and that no IRCops will do that, all those were just before you glined us with a false reason. As i said, it looks like you're in doubt abt the network rules, you arent supposed to "give" channels that already has ops, to someone else, even if the op is a bot. And b4 we got glined, some responsible opers advised us to keep bnc bots to protect the chans, but whenever we went offline you suspended those bots silently, and you call that doing "openly". Well, the bots were from botservives and we have lots of witnesses to that, so i've lately sent an email on this to the netowork/server admins to look at the extent of lameness shown by the lower opers. Dont worry we have IRCop witnesses as well, we'll just find another ip to get into the network, and show your reply at #feds and other evidences (though by then you will be shouting "i havent posted this reply" to save your ass).
Henrik wrote:
| Quote: |
Summing it up, I'd say that people who complain about having/not having channels like #allnitecafe under their control should simply !@#$ the hell off as their only concern is to get as much power as they can, even though they have no clue of what to do with it. |
Not having channel LIKE #AllNiteCafe? BY LIKE you mean BIG. So the channel being BIG, you had to take it oevr from its real owners right? You took away our channel coz it was BIG, and now blaming it on us because we want our channels back? Retards like you shoudnt really be given oper status in big networks like this, and that's what puts this network down.
You will be dealt with in #feds, so posting further threads to save your ass wont help. We dont need any further replies from you and dont try to fill this thread with lies to justify your ass again. The discussion with you is over here retard! All your later posts will be ignored. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
w00t
Eleet
Joined: 09 Jun 2004
Posts: 698
Location: Nowra, Australia
|
| Posted: Sep 19, 2005 7:28am Post subject: |
|
|
| After reading these latest replies, I guess a question must be asked why then you've stayed on QNet? Surely there must be a reason that overrides the negativity of this whole thing? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Sep 19, 2005 9:22am Post subject: |
|
|
This topic is clearly a pile of shit..
First of all, he's not "my" staff member, also I should comment on what you said, I replied to this topic before to inform what had happened, and no I'm not a "liar" - I'm telling the truth.
Think what you want, no one cares, use another network if you have to cry all the time about you violating/someone related to the channel when before it was suspended.
"According to Quakenet rules, whoever is op in a channel, be it idlebot or whatever shit it is, it is the righful admin of the channel and no one, not even the IRCops are supposed to deop it."
Sure.. but idle bots are forbidden by Quakenet rules, too?
What is best a 40 user channel with no one to stop spamming and a bot to keep the channel, or a bot and some staff to operate the channel and spam-free?
| JusticeMan wrote: | [Calum wrote:]I'm not being the childish one at the moment. I recommend this topic gets closed, what I previously said first, says it all.
I meant to say the gline had been lifted before 2months were up, don't know why, don't care either way.
I am controlling ALLNITECAFE now, and preventing all sorts of spam, and so on. If you don't like it, then it's your own fault for getting suspended or whatever.
Lanmate and a few others are controlling CHATZONE for the sake of the channel(needs some sort of management)
And when the channel was re-opened, an _idle_ bot was holding the channel, this meaning no one running the channel, so it was fair.
and no, I'm no way involved with Quakenet, I've just been in that channel for along time and know what goes on.
-EOD- |
1 You are not being childish, you are the same lier that we've known at Quakenet.
2 So poor lamer, you're really confused about the gline timings and etc, well lets go to #Help without you're fucked up staff member and sort it out (if both of you the guts, since you both should know that you're lying)
3 Staffs arent supposed to control channels or give a damn abt it's needs or management. No owner means no channel according to Quakenet rules. So you're tellin me when owners leave a channel staffs take it over right? Lamer.
4 You have been in that channel less than a month, and if you're not even sure of that, lets ask some IRCops to investigate it (im currently glines by that lame oper of urs, i'll find some other ip to get in). The opers know everything, so no worries Lamer.
5 The best way for you to justify your ass is by lying, but who cares, we cant change what has happened, so i dont give a damn to what you say, neither do i need your replies or excuses.
6 According to Quakenet rules, whoever is op in a channel, be it idlebot or whatever shit it is, it is the righful admin of the channel and no one, not even the IRCops are supposed to deop it. And staffs arent supposed to be bothered about if anyone is running a channel or not, Lamer its out of the rules, there are hundreds of thousands of channels in quakenet and unless you're really interested abt big public channels like #AllNiteCafe and #Chatzone, you wudnt bother abt it.
Now listen dumbass F_Jack, your lies arent gettin you anywhere. I dont need any further reply from you so buzz off. The topic is abt lame opers, not random noobs.[/quote] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Sep 19, 2005 9:40am Post subject: |
|
|
| Well people you make my heart bleed. Its really simple. The operators of the Quakenet network have the right to do what they want. If you dont like it !@#$ off to efnet |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Henrik
Guest
|
| Posted: Sep 19, 2005 9:40am Post subject: |
|
|
If I was power hungry I would clearly go for channels I am at least half-way interested in, can't see how fixing up channels seemingly owned by idle bots satisfys my huge need for power with me not even being ON the channel.
I actually read half of the rubbish you wrote so let's add one last statement before I leave this thread of yours for ever and ever and ever and ever (scrubs quote, btw). Idle bots are not allowed on quakenet, occupying channels with them is even worse. Next time you own a channel you like better not get it glined, heh |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ed
SearchIRC Staff
Joined: 25 May 2003
Posts: 366
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
|
| Posted: Sep 19, 2005 11:57am Post subject: |
|
|
Thread locked.
I think everyone got their point across, and now y'all are just attacking each other. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| |
Register
Log in
