Home | Networks | Community | Need Help? 

 
 Quick search

 
 
 RegisterRegister   Log inLog in 

oper/admin cert training
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SearchIRC Forum Index -> Chat

Would you use a 3rd party oper/admin training certification as a hiring tool?
yes
25%
 25%  [ 5 ]
no
35%
 35%  [ 7 ]
I don't know
5%
 5%  [ 1 ]
depends on the credibility of the trainers
35%
 35%  [ 7 ]
Total Votes : 20

Author Message
katsklaw
Guru
Guru


Joined: 28 Jun 2004
Posts: 1614
Location: Somewhere you're not.

PostPosted: Jul 16, 2009 7:06pm    Post subject: oper/admin cert training Reply with quote

Lets move this conversation to here and stop hijacking someone's thread Wink

I'll say that my last reply was from my iPod, so I'll apologize for typos, missed words and spaces ... etc. It's so hard to see a website plus an on screen keyboard on a 3 inch screen Wink

I'd also like to say that there is no concrete, cut and dry way of "qualifying" trainers. Experience alone can't work as some people catch on faster than others. This is why I said it would have to be considered. Simply put, a small network sees hardly anything compared to a large network that has hundreds of thousands of registered nicks and 10's of thousands of services transactions per hour. Case in point an average week of killing clones on DALnet was about 10K clones (this was before session limits btw). There is no way that I've killed remotely close to that many users combined in the years after on other networks.

I do think extensive interviews and everyone getting to know one another is more important that facts about experience.

It's also my intention that the core certification be generic and mainly RFC1459 compliant with a few exceptions. It will not be ircd, client or services specific at all. This will allow trainees to return to their network trained in IRC, network/software specific training would then be up to them. That said, there may be some specialty courses that focus on a certain ircd/services. Admin training would also include netiquette as well as PR training to help better management of personnel. There just wouldn't be any way for us to train for any specific network, sorry. There would also be training on minimalistic control practices and exercises such as using channel modes to control unruly users instead of /kills or talking to malicious users out of their habits instead of /gline. This minimalistic training will help ween admins from the feeling that they need to be all powerful God like opers to handle users.

That said there could be some conflicts between our training and your network. For example, not all IRCd's support local channels anymore, even though it's arguably required by RFC. Additionally some IRCd's don't support /join 0 either, which btw is supposed to part the issuer from all channels. It's a carryover from IRC v1.
Back to top
ButtaKnife
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 26 Apr 2005
Posts: 93

PostPosted: Jul 17, 2009 9:54am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I voted Yes, but I want to clarify my thoughts on the training/certification idea. I think it would be great to have some kind of training and certification process, and if executed correctly, I would encourage people to go through the process. I can't see our network using it as a "hiring tool" in the sense of making a difference in whether or not we bring someone on staff. For us, the character of the person being considered for staff is far more important than IRC knowledge and experience. I could definitely see the training being used along side of our own training, and it might be neat for everyone on staff to be certified eventually. Razz

An idea struck me last night: It may also be possible for networks to designate their own trainers to handle network-specific certifications. I haven't thought this through yet, so it may be a horrible idea.

In any case, I'm really curious to see where this goes. Very Happy
Back to top
Drakling
none
none


Joined: 05 Jul 2009
Posts: 24

PostPosted: Jul 17, 2009 11:48am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I somewhat agree with ButtaKnife. I'd definitely use it as a staff training resource. I would also use it as an aid when selecting staff as well. While ButtaKnife was dead on, that the character of the person is the more important than this certification, if you have 2 people with identical character, 1 of them went through this training and certification thing while the other one didn't, I'd definitely pick up the certified applicant first.
Back to top
Trixar_za
Eleet
Eleet


Joined: 10 Dec 2006
Posts: 624
Location: South Africa

PostPosted: Jul 17, 2009 2:46pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Drakling wrote:
I somewhat agree with ButtaKnife. I'd definitely use it as a staff training resource. I would also use it as an aid when selecting staff as well. While ButtaKnife was dead on, that the character of the person is the more important than this certification, if you have 2 people with identical character, 1 of them went through this training and certification thing while the other one didn't, I'd definitely pick up the certified applicant first.

Knowing katsklaw, Drakling, I would say that he'd weed out the power crazy opers and asses. You need a sense of humour and true desire to be great at IRC to learn from him, otherwise you'll get the brunt end of is wit - it's not pretty - trust me on that. I've seen it Razz
Back to top
Drakling
none
none


Joined: 05 Jul 2009
Posts: 24

PostPosted: Jul 17, 2009 6:04pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

oh I already know all of that
Back to top
katsklaw
Guru
Guru


Joined: 28 Jun 2004
Posts: 1614
Location: Somewhere you're not.

PostPosted: Jul 17, 2009 6:38pm    Post subject: ? Reply with quote

to be clear, this wouldn't be a replacement for network training but an augmentation.

"hiring tool" meaning those with it have a better chance of winning the "job", not an "OMFG YOU GOTS CERTS?!?!?!?!"
Back to top
katsklaw
Guru
Guru


Joined: 28 Jun 2004
Posts: 1614
Location: Somewhere you're not.

PostPosted: Aug 03, 2009 7:50am    Post subject: Reply with quote

everyone interested in this idea regardless of if you want to help train or want to be trained or interested in training for your staff. Please PM me for more information.
Back to top
katsklaw
Guru
Guru


Joined: 28 Jun 2004
Posts: 1614
Location: Somewhere you're not.

PostPosted: Aug 03, 2009 12:08pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

No offense to anyone that has already replied nor am I implying such. I just want to clarify interest level, I'm looking for those that are actively interested, not those that say they are interested then only appear once every 2 weeks for a few minutes or those that connect and then idle for days on end inserting phrases every couple days.

Thanks
Back to top
Telume
none
none


Joined: 06 Jul 2007
Posts: 46

PostPosted: Aug 03, 2009 12:40pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There's only one reason I wouldn't use it as a hiring pool.

While you can teach someone commands and all that jazz. What you can't teach is how to think.

Sure there are the common situations like drones and spammers. There's always going to be some of those.

But you can't teach someone how to act because, everyone is different. You could be certified, but, every network has their customs that not every other person will like.

And just because you're "certified" doesn't really mean that you're better, sure you may know more, but, you may not fit into the network's overall structure.

In small networks especially people will want a familiar face as an oper not someone who waves around a whole bunch of diplomas going "I'm better than you because I'm certified." Mostly because the person is well-known or familiar and they're deemed by both users and staff as some one who can be trusted.

Just my opinion.
Back to top
Trixar_za
Eleet
Eleet


Joined: 10 Dec 2006
Posts: 624
Location: South Africa

PostPosted: Aug 03, 2009 1:24pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think there is a misunderstanding somewhere, Telume.

Knowing katsklaw, I think he'll focus MORE on training these people to how to think and shape their beliefs rather than just teach them commands. One thing I noticed is that the power crazy people and asses tend to disappear pretty quickly around him because he doesn't put up with their crap and he's good at spotting them early.

This concept aims to teach people to me IRCops - inspite of the network their on or where they come from. Teaching people loads of commands doesn't make them IRCops, just like most MCSE people discover when they get into IT Businesses for real. For somebody to become an true IRCop, you need to teach them how to think, act and react. Then and ONLY then do you teach them the commands.

Anyway, this is my rant for the day Wink
Back to top
katsklaw
Guru
Guru


Joined: 28 Jun 2004
Posts: 1614
Location: Somewhere you're not.

PostPosted: Aug 03, 2009 3:35pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

IRCop - basics will teach commands.
IRCop - advanced will teach basic networking, network routing.
IRCop - CSR will teach professionalism and basic Customer Service.
IRCop - minimalist will teach opers how to use basic user level access as well as skills built in IRCop - CSR to negotiate with attackers without using "hostile force" ie kill/akill/gline.
IRCop - Defense will teach tell tale signs of nasties and eradication.

The IRCop is then certified and returned to their network to attend said networks training programs. It's assumed that the network that sent the oper-to-be already meets that networks "how to think" requirements.

{Admin series can not be taken without an ircop cert code first}
Admin - basics will teach server configuration.
Admin - advanced will teach merging, oper management, issue resolution, ISP reporting and liaison.

The Admin is then certified and returned to their network to attend said networks training programs. It's assumed that the network that sent the admin-to-be already meets that networks "how to think" requirements.

Users that have not been referred by a network will receive the same training and *ALL* users will have additional specialized training made available to them. In the event that any person needs to verify course completion, that information will be made available. No personal information is shared at the time of verification. We will ask the inquiring person the first and last name of the person in question as well as their certification code, which be use to cross reference course completion. Any test scores or other information we gather will be held confidential and not released.

Users, opers and admins that complete training are advised to only share their certification code when they apply for a position and it is requested by the network they are applying to.

It's not my intention to "weed out power hungry assholes". That's the job of individual networks. It's my intention to teach opers and admins how IRC works because I'm personally tired of seeing so called NetAdmins that don't even know the syntax for joining a keyed channel.

How you react to a certified oper/admin that applies for a staff position is your business, not ours.
Back to top
Telume
none
none


Joined: 06 Jul 2007
Posts: 46

PostPosted: Aug 04, 2009 7:57pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
It's not my intention to "weed out power hungry assholes". That's the job of individual networks. It's my intention to teach opers and admins how IRC works because I'm personally tired of seeing so called NetAdmins that don't even know the syntax for joining a keyed channel.


Now the idea of that is just too damn funny.
Back to top
katsklaw
Guru
Guru


Joined: 28 Jun 2004
Posts: 1614
Location: Somewhere you're not.

PostPosted: Aug 04, 2009 10:03pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Telume wrote:
Quote:
It's not my intention to "weed out power hungry assholes". That's the job of individual networks. It's my intention to teach opers and admins how IRC works because I'm personally tired of seeing so called NetAdmins that don't even know the syntax for joining a keyed channel.


Now the idea of that is just too damn funny.


It would be if it wasn't true, I stopped laughing years ago.
Back to top
mentor
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Posts: 91
Location: San Diego, CA

PostPosted: Aug 07, 2009 2:10am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Trixar_za wrote:
I think there is a misunderstanding somewhere, Telume.

Knowing katsklaw, I think he'll focus MORE on training these people to how to think and shape their beliefs rather than just teach them commands. One thing I noticed is that the power crazy people and asses tend to disappear pretty quickly around him because he doesn't put up with their crap and he's good at spotting them early.

This concept aims to teach people to me IRCops - inspite of the network their on or where they come from. Teaching people loads of commands doesn't make them IRCops, just like most MCSE people discover when they get into IT Businesses for real. For somebody to become an true IRCop, you need to teach them how to think, act and react. Then and ONLY then do you teach them the commands.

Anyway, this is my rant for the day Wink


He was pretty spot on, imo. While I don't have any strong feelings either way on this issue, I will add this...

Each network's climate and culture is different. Your beliefs and thought process may completely contradict mine. Sure, a certification program is great for teaching the in's and outs of the protocol, especially the more esoteric parts of it, but teaching one how to "think, act and react" -- that stuff is better left to the network (e.g. some sort of orientation program) -- which even then, you can only do so much.

But then, on the flip side, I guess you could say, only those networks that feel comfortable with what is being taught would actually even take any of this seriously.
Back to top
katsklaw
Guru
Guru


Joined: 28 Jun 2004
Posts: 1614
Location: Somewhere you're not.

PostPosted: Aug 07, 2009 6:44am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mentor wrote:
Sure, a certification program is great for teaching the in's and outs of the protocol, especially the more esoteric parts of it, but teaching one how to "think, act and react" -- that stuff is better left to the network


As I've stated already. This is exactly what my program does and doesn't do. Telume *was* spot on for what he was saying and I agree, which is why it's not included.

Like Trixar, I too think that at first Telume misunderstood the purpose of my idea. So he was 100% correct in his statement, but it doesn't apply here because that's not what I'm trying to do.

The only person that said I was going to shape how a person thinks is Trixar, and he is wrong about that.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SearchIRC Forum Index -> Chat All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
 
Forum powered by phpBB
 
 © 2000 - 2008 EverythingIRC, Inc. All rights reserved. Please read our disclaimer