|
|
| Author |
Message |
Jobe
Eleet
Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 528
Location: Lurking in the shadows of some random channel!
|
 Posted: Dec 10, 2006 5:52am Post subject: |
 |
|
| spung wrote: | | ...As far as I'm concerned RFC1459 doesn't exist.... |
By that statement youre basically saying IRC doesnt exist and there is no standard for any server or client to use thereby making clients and servers incompatible. RFC1459 until otherwise stateted is THE base spec of IRC updated NOT replaced by RFC's 2810-2813
If you dont at least stick to RFC 1456 for the most part youre not by definition writing an IRC server. Youre writing some custome protocol that has nothing to do with IRC or is only in parts similar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jobe
Eleet
Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 528
Location: Lurking in the shadows of some random channel!
|
| Posted: Dec 10, 2006 5:24pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok so i fail at typing 1459  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
]Daniel
Idler
Joined: 05 Jan 2006
Posts: 319
Location: Boise, ID
|
| Posted: Dec 14, 2006 1:53pm Post subject: |
|
|
| If your not gonna follow the RFC, I can guarentee a few things. You will definetly not keep users because their clients will break when they connect to your ircd, which will piss alot of people off. You shouldnt even call it an IRCd, cause the basis is to at least go by the RFC to an extent. It isnt much a set of rules, it's just a guideline to follow to make sure you have full compatibility. I was interested in this at first, but seeing your attitude after the first post, I changed my mind. And whats this bullshit about this "Olene" person. Who gives a !@#$ who you are. And how you brought all these "internet guys" to their knees. Thats why I prefer real life girls to internet girls. ...And this is why I wont touch DALnet with a 200 foot pole anymore. Oh well, Suit yourself. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Crash_ChatNSN
Idler
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 252
Location: Little Rock Ar
|
| Posted: Jan 04, 2007 8:58pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Whats so bad about IRCx? people tell me its evil, but i think its far more advanced then IRCd |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Drakx
Lurker
Joined: 17 Feb 2006
Posts: 139
|
| Posted: Jan 05, 2007 8:07am Post subject: |
|
|
| When you say "IRCd" which one are you talking about a lot of people refer to IRCd as unreal, ratbox, ircu2, charybdis etc etc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Crash_ChatNSN
Idler
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 252
Location: Little Rock Ar
|
| Posted: Jan 05, 2007 8:50am Post subject: |
|
|
| ANy IRCd server. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PingBad
Post Whore
Joined: 05 Feb 2005
Posts: 3027
Location: New Zealand
|
| Posted: Jan 05, 2007 2:44pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Drakx wrote: | | When you say "IRCd" which one are you talking about a lot of people refer to IRCd as unreal, ratbox, ircu2, charybdis etc etc. |
Taken literally, IRCd means Internet Relay Chat daemon... so essentially any piece of software that acts like an IRC server is an ircd |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jobe
Eleet
Joined: 30 Jul 2006
Posts: 528
Location: Lurking in the shadows of some random channel!
|
| Posted: Jan 05, 2007 6:11pm Post subject: |
|
|
| To add to that any server that provides an IRC compatible service can essentially be called an IRCd. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Crash_ChatNSN
Idler
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 252
Location: Little Rock Ar
|
| Posted: Jan 06, 2007 7:18am Post subject: |
|
|
| Even it none of the modes and commands match each other? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Register
Log in
