Home | Networks | Community | Need Help? 

 
 Quick search

 
 
 RegisterRegister   Log inLog in 

New United States Congress Bill!!! BE WARNED!!
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SearchIRC Forum Index -> Chat
Author Message
MOVIEBOT
Lurker
Lurker


Joined: 24 May 2004
Posts: 229
Location: Poland

PostPosted: Apr 23, 2006 8:23am    Post subject: New United States Congress Bill!!! BE WARNED!! Reply with quote

For You Americans

congress is about to sell out the Internet by letting big phone and cable companies set up toll booths along the information superhighway.

Companies like AT&T, Verizon and Comcast are spending tens of millions in Washington to kill "network neutrality" -- a principle that keeps the Internet open to all.

A bill moving quickly through Congress would let these companies become Internet gatekeepers, deciding which Web sites go fast or slow -- and which won't load at all -- based on who pays them more. The rest of us will be detoured to the "slow lane," clicking furiously and waiting for our favorite sites to download. Even if you have a fast web connection or not!!

Don't let Congress ruin the Internet:


tell congress to save internet neutrality now!!!!!
Code:
http://action.freepress.net/campaign/savethenet/i7xubbn4fjnx8jd?


Our elected representatives are trading favors for campaign donations from phone and cable companies. They're being wooed by people like AT&T's CEO, who says "the Internet can't be free" and wants to decide what you do, where you go and what you watch online.

The best ideas never come from those with the deepest pockets.
It comes from people like us!!!! the poor or low income net inovators... If the phone and cable companies get their way, the free and open Internet could soon be fenced in by large corporations. If Congress turns the Internet over to giants like AT&T, everyone who uses the Internet will suffer:

* Google users -- Another search engine could pay AT&T to guarantee that it opens faster than Google on your computer.

* iPod listeners -- Comcast could slow access to iTunes, steering you to a higher-priced music service that paid for the privilege.

* Work-at-home parents -- Connecting to your office could take longer if you don't purchase your carrier's preferred applications. Sending family photos and videos could slow to a crawl.

* Retirees -- Web pages you always use for online banking, access to health care information, planning a trip or communicating with friends and family could fall victim to Verizon's pay-for-speed schemes.

* Bloggers -- Costs will skyrocket to post and share video and audio clips -- silencing citizen journalists and amplifying the mainstream media.

* Online activists -- Political organizing could be slowed by the handful of dominant Internet providers who ask advocacy groups to pay a fee to join the "fast lane."

* Small businesses -- When AT&T favors their own services, you won't be able to choose more affordable providers for online video, teleconferencing, and Internet phone calls.

* Innovators with the "next big idea" -- Startups and entrepreneurs will be muscled out of the marketplace by big corporations that pay for a top spot on the Web.

We can't let Congress ruin the free and open Internet.
We must act now or lose the Internet as we know it.

We must act now or lose the Internet as we know it.
visit
Code:
http://www.savetheinternet.com/

to contact your representative, learn more about this issue, and discuss this campaign with other activists.

tell your friends who live in the US about this campain

Code:
http://action.freepress.net/campaign/savethenet/forward


-----------------------------


people tell others !!!
Back to top
FBI
Guru
Guru


Joined: 19 Aug 2005
Posts: 1534
Location: Federation Of Bored IRC'ers

PostPosted: Apr 23, 2006 12:39pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dude you can't control the internet....


They can try but I don't think they can
Back to top
katsklaw
Guru
Guru


Joined: 28 Jun 2004
Posts: 1614
Location: Somewhere you're not.

PostPosted: Apr 23, 2006 1:22pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

FBI wrote:
Dude you can't control the internet....


They can try but I don't think they can


They can do what they like with data that passes through their network so long as it's legal ... including but not limited to nullrouting it. However, that's an ability that they already have.
Back to top
Jason
SearchIRC Developer
SearchIRC Developer


Joined: 03 May 2003
Posts: 1484
Location: Tampa, FL

PostPosted: Apr 23, 2006 1:28pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would switch providers rather rapidly if that happened to my connection.
Back to top
katsklaw
Guru
Guru


Joined: 28 Jun 2004
Posts: 1614
Location: Somewhere you're not.

PostPosted: Apr 23, 2006 1:49pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jason wrote:
I would switch providers rather rapidly if that happened to my connection.


I would too .. but if it become a common practice like many other things have become .. then it will get harder and harder to find a provider that doesn't.

Just like it's getting harder and harder to find datacenters that allow IRC related activities on their bandwidth. Sure they are still easy to find at this point in the trend .. but who knows .. some day there may not be any. Sad
Back to top
mjd
none
none


Joined: 31 Mar 2006
Posts: 38

PostPosted: Apr 23, 2006 2:21pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just my opinion, but I think as long as there is something to sell, someone will sell it. There are lots of people out there these days who will do ANYTHING for a buck. That includes selling dedicated servers that allow IRC related programs.

As far as the other thing goes, the companies will have to think about what's best for their business. I'm sure they'll also consider the substantial amount of customers they'd lose if this were to happen.
Back to top
ARcanUSNUMquam
none
none


Joined: 25 Mar 2006
Posts: 42

PostPosted: Apr 23, 2006 2:58pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mjd: The thing about your viewpoint is that it doesn't work when something is a neccessity (the Internet), every company that provides access is in cahoots, and the infrastructure setup costs are prohibitively high.

Don't get me wrong, I'm a big fan of free market systems, like the one you are advocating, but sometimes, the free market fails, and this is one of those times.

Every BACKBONE provider out there wants to kill network neutrality (NN). That means there is no choice for the consumers. Since the Internet is a neccessity, the consumers will be forced to go to these people that kill NN, and the backbone providers will have no incentive to keep NN. Nobody can start up their own Internet infrastructure because of two things.

1) It costs hella. Try putting huge fiber lines all accross the world. Pretty damn hard and costly.

2) Consumers on the new infrastructure will still need to deal with the NN schemes of the old infrastructure. As a result, while the stuff in the new infrastrcuture will be fast, the stuff on the old will be slow. What is on the old? Websites that everybody visits like Google, Ebay, Yahoo, Myspace, Wikipedia, and SearchIRC. There is no good reason for the consumers to go to the new infrastructure becuase there is nothing good there.

As a free market die-hard and freedom lover, I'm torn on this issue. I recognize the freedom that companies have when dealing with their own networks. I also see how the free market can't solve this problem to my liking, as it can with many other issues. I see how the Internet will be fundamentally changed if this bill goes through, and as an Internet lover too, it's a hard decision for me.
Back to top
FBI
Guru
Guru


Joined: 19 Aug 2005
Posts: 1534
Location: Federation Of Bored IRC'ers

PostPosted: Apr 23, 2006 3:02pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It'll take years for the bills to pass if theres people who were against it...

Thanks to our Bill Of Rights we can sue and delay the bill Razz

Also our president have the power to VETO the bill if hes smart enough Wink
Back to top
PingBad
Post Whore
Post Whore


Joined: 05 Feb 2005
Posts: 3027
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Apr 23, 2006 3:57pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And this is why I'm proud to be a New Zealander (not saying we don't have our own internet connectively problems... TELECON!).
In my opinion, the bill will fail. Consider:
  • Bill passes
  • Public outrage
  • Everyone switches to cheaper, more reliable providers
  • Big wigs soon become nothing more than writings in a history book
  • Bill gets revoked from US legislation
The Internet is not some commodity that only America controls, so all they're doing is hurting themselves. The rest of the world will keep surfing merrily away while AT&T, AOL, and the other big'uns duke it out
Back to top
FBI
Guru
Guru


Joined: 19 Aug 2005
Posts: 1534
Location: Federation Of Bored IRC'ers

PostPosted: Apr 23, 2006 4:01pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

They'll go bankrupt....

Since everyone switches...lol
Back to top
ab0rted
Lurker
Lurker


Joined: 10 Nov 2005
Posts: 208

PostPosted: Apr 24, 2006 3:48pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

switch
Back to top
Jason
SearchIRC Developer
SearchIRC Developer


Joined: 03 May 2003
Posts: 1484
Location: Tampa, FL

PostPosted: Apr 24, 2006 4:45pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ARcanUSNUMquam wrote:
Every BACKBONE provider out there wants to kill network neutrality (NN).


It's really only the telecos that want it. They are losing money on all the voip activity, and without phone service, their roles are greatly diminished.

Disclaimer: I work for Verizon.
Back to top
ARcanUSNUMquam
none
none


Joined: 25 Mar 2006
Posts: 42

PostPosted: Apr 24, 2006 7:19pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jason wrote:
ARcanUSNUMquam wrote:
Every BACKBONE provider out there wants to kill network neutrality (NN).


It's really only the telecos that want it. They are losing money on all the voip activity, and without phone service, their roles are greatly diminished.

Disclaimer: I work for Verizon.


You work for Verizon? Maybe you can get them to bring FIOS to my area. Drool

On a more serious note, what about all those ISPs and people crapping their pants about bandwidth issues? I admit, all the sources I've been reading from are pretty biased about this issue, so I may have gotten the wrong impression.
Further reading from Wikipedia: (God the article on NN is horrible) says that its mainly the Baby bells that want it. Anybody know of any good, unbiased (as possible) sources where we can read about this from?
Back to top
Jason
SearchIRC Developer
SearchIRC Developer


Joined: 03 May 2003
Posts: 1484
Location: Tampa, FL

PostPosted: Apr 24, 2006 9:41pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hehe. This site runs on Fios :)

I hear rumors about us offering 100mbs down, 20mbps up by the end of the year.

we're doing less than 2 mill homes a year, so unless you live in some areas in FL or TX, your chances are kinda slim.
Back to top
PingBad
Post Whore
Post Whore


Joined: 05 Feb 2005
Posts: 3027
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Apr 24, 2006 10:01pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

*moves into Jason's pad so he too can enjoy FIOS* (it sounds sexeh, aight?)
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SearchIRC Forum Index -> Chat All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
 
Forum powered by phpBB
 
 © 2000 - 2008 EverythingIRC, Inc. All rights reserved. Please read our disclaimer