Home | Networks | Community | Need Help? 

 
 Quick search

 
 
 RegisterRegister   Log inLog in 

windows
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SearchIRC Forum Index -> IRCD & Network Services
Author Message
Plasma
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 10 Dec 2003
Posts: 63

PostPosted: Feb 11, 2006 7:04am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think its stupid that many people bash windows because its not "leet" enough to run an IRC server - what load of crap.

Windows has no problem running an IRC server - either is fine.

Having said that, the one I run (which only houses ~100 people at any one time) runs on a linux server simply because thats what we have available - either OS would be fine.
Back to top
nenolod
Idler
Idler


Joined: 23 Jan 2004
Posts: 357
Location: A box!

PostPosted: Feb 11, 2006 2:15pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm sorry, but Windows 9x, ME is not capable of running a stable IRC server for more than 20 connections. This is by design of Windows 9x Winsock.

Windows 2000/XP/2003 Server? That can probably run the living hell out of an IRCd, but when it comes down to it, using UNIX (such as FreeBSD)/UNIX-like systems (such as Linux), is probably a lot more cost effective when you take into consideration how much effort would be required to maintain a secure Windows installation on a production system. Not to mention that most Windows Update packages require a full system restart.

That said, I used to oper on a network that was WIRCD-only... they ran Windows 2003 and a heavily modified Unreal... The network had about 2000 users until it was shut down by it's owner because the services hub got hacked.

So yes, it *is* possible... just not very feasible to do it right.

--nenolod
Back to top
magpie
Idler
Idler


Joined: 18 Jan 2004
Posts: 453
Location: Essex, UK

PostPosted: Feb 11, 2006 2:39pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think it's safe to say that Windows 9x, ME just shouldn't be used full stop. :)

Completely agree with your other points though. I think the main problem when people argue that Windows shouldn't be used for an IRC server is that they argue completely wrong or irrelevant issues.
Back to top
Aven
Idler
Idler


Joined: 05 Aug 2005
Posts: 393

PostPosted: Feb 11, 2006 3:23pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I ran Unreal on windows XP long ago (when I was trying out ircds and all) and trust me, it sucked ass. Very low socket limit and it kept disconnecting every few days or so. Then switched to linux, a lot better Wink

However, I heard that Windows 2000 isn't as bad.
Back to top
SATAN-HHH
Eleet
Eleet


Joined: 29 Nov 2003
Posts: 942
Location: Texas

PostPosted: Feb 17, 2006 10:02am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Windows just is not stable enough, I dont care what version it is. It isn't a hardware issue, it's just an issue that windows sucks as far as use for public-performance software (like an ircd). You're better off using your favorite linux distro or buying a shell.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SearchIRC Forum Index -> IRCD & Network Services All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
 
Forum powered by phpBB
 
 © 2000 - 2008 EverythingIRC, Inc. All rights reserved. Please read our disclaimer