|
|
| Author |
Message |
marc
Lurker
Joined: 10 Jun 2005
Posts: 161
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
 Posted: Jun 30, 2006 1:18am Post subject: |
 |
|
got another one for ya. my network just has X for users use.
irc.nullrewted.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
speakz
none
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 9
|
| Posted: Jun 30, 2006 10:47am Post subject: |
|
|
| Well i have icelink.org but we have GNUworld service already |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
FBI
Guru
Joined: 19 Aug 2005
Posts: 1534
Location: Federation Of Bored IRC'ers
|
| Posted: Jun 30, 2006 12:38pm Post subject: |
|
|
irc.nullrewted.org
They use UnderNet X.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
FuRiOuS
Lurker
Joined: 01 Feb 2006
Posts: 244
|
| Posted: Jun 30, 2006 4:04pm Post subject: |
|
|
| psssstt FBI look up ;p |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
FBI
Guru
Joined: 19 Aug 2005
Posts: 1534
Location: Federation Of Bored IRC'ers
|
| Posted: Jun 30, 2006 4:08pm Post subject: |
|
|
| FuRiOuS wrote: | | psssstt FBI look up ;p |
Oh well lol
my bad |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cilsh
none
Joined: 30 Jun 2006
Posts: 13
|
| Posted: Jun 30, 2006 4:27pm Post subject: |
|
|
| isn't gnuworld, X etc. still services...? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
FuRiOuS
Lurker
Joined: 01 Feb 2006
Posts: 244
|
| Posted: Jun 30, 2006 5:02pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's ok FBI your excused lol..
Cilsh while I do think they are technically considered services, most people only consider services something like anope etc, in which you are able to control virtually everything about a server, channel, nick etc. But I might be wrong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cilsh
none
Joined: 30 Jun 2006
Posts: 13
|
| Posted: Jun 30, 2006 5:04pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | GNUWorld is an IRC operator services server |
from ht tp : // gnuworld . undernet . org/
(new users can't post urls, bla bla) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
]Daniel
Idler
Joined: 05 Jan 2006
Posts: 319
Location: Boise, ID
|
| Posted: Jul 01, 2006 12:26am Post subject: |
|
|
Planetary Gaming uses SRVX which is what X3 is built off of. I would also like to briefly explain something. Both X3 and Srvx are somewhat "regular" services as compared to the whole NickServ, Chanserv, etc. SRVX and X3 both come complete with a "choice" of NickServ or AuthServ(AfterNET just decided to name their bots something else), memoserv, operserv(aka opserv), and the help system(aka helpserv). They run different than other services, but hey, most of the other services are in ways different. To put this basically. We arent a servicesless network in your context, but niether is AfterNET. SRVX and anything built off of it is mainly a services program built especially for the IRCu/P10 Protocol IRCd. Hence AfterNET develops Nefarious, a fork of IRCu. With that said, Please enjoy the imaginary pie and chips Ive set out for our guests.
Daniel |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ozafy
none
Joined: 12 Sep 2004
Posts: 18
|
| Posted: Jul 01, 2006 4:28am Post subject: |
|
|
| BorkNet(.org) uses a self written set of services based of the whole Q/X concept. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
katsklaw
Guru
Joined: 28 Jun 2004
Posts: 1614
Location: Somewhere you're not.
|
| Posted: Jul 01, 2006 12:38pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Some of you have missread the thread .. they are looking for nets with NO Services ... that means WITHOUT Chanserv, X, Anope, GNUworld, ABC or XYZ bots .. no Auspice, no srxv, no atheme, no custom services either .. none ... nada .. nine .. niche .. zero ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ozafy
none
Joined: 12 Sep 2004
Posts: 18
|
| Posted: Jul 01, 2006 2:32pm Post subject: Re: Listing of networks without services? |
|
|
| Varter wrote: | ...Although I am partial to Undernet's X bot and AfterNET's X2 and X3. This exception comes from the fact that on these networks, channel services are possible without being prisoner to a nickname...
I'll get the ball rolling.
Undernet
Quakenet
EFnet
AfterNET
... |
He said networks that don't have the *serv setup, more to the point, networks without nickserv.
I think you're the one misreading, especially since his first list included Quakenet and Undernet. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
]Daniel
Idler
Joined: 05 Jan 2006
Posts: 319
Location: Boise, ID
|
| Posted: Jul 02, 2006 9:50am Post subject: |
|
|
| You guys yet again didn't read another thing he said. He considered AfterNET as one of the networks cause they renamed their services from ChanServ to X3 and X2, They still use AuthServ. So before you make a smart ass comment on "no srvx". He does not understand that those are STILL irc services. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bobjuh
none
Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 27
|
| Posted: Jul 02, 2006 3:22pm Post subject: |
|
|
ircnet doesn't have services  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Register
Log in
